New estimates are coming out on Obamacare and the truth of the actual cost is becoming much clearer. Obamacare will not save money, will not cut the deficit and will continue to erode healthcare as we know it in the USA. More and more people are becoming enlightened by the truth. No wonder support for the repeal of Obamacare continues to grow.
Here is just a few more of the creative ways the Obama administration distorted the facts to pass this takeover of healthcare.
Omission of the Medicare "Doc Fix"
The Obama Administration and leaders in Congress chose to use all of the tax hikes and spending cuts they could find to create another new entitlement instead of paying for a fix for Medicare physician fees (the so-called “doc fix”). Under current law, those fees are set to get cut by 21 percent in June. The Obama Administration wants to undo the cut permanently, but it does not provide any offsetting savings. The result will be a spending increase of between $250 billion and $400 billion over a decade. Passing an unfinanced “doc fix” wipes out all of the supposed savings from the new legislation and greatly adds to the burden on future taxpayers.
The CLASS Act Gimmick
The new health law creates a voluntary long-term care insurance program, called the Community Living Assistance Services and Supports (CLASS) Act. Those who sign up for it must pay premiums for five years before becoming eligible for benefit payments. Consequently, premiums paid by enrollees build a small surplus—about $70 billion over 10 years according to CBO—which the health law’s proponents claim as deficit reduction. But these premiums will be needed in short order to pay actual claims.
Medicare Cuts
CBO and the Chief Actuary for the Medicare program have both stated that Medicare spending cuts cannot be counted twice—to pay for a new entitlement expansion and to claim that Medicare’s financial outlook has improved. But that is exactly what the proponents of the new legislation do. If the Medicare cuts and tax hikes for the hospital trust fund (about $400 billion over 10 years, according to CBO) are used solely to improve the capacity of the government to pay future Medicare claims, then the health law becomes a massive exercise in deficit spending.
Estimates of Employees Dropped from Job-Based Coverage
The new insurance arrangements in the state-based exchanges will provide massive new subsidies to low- and moderate-wage households. For instance, at 200 percent FPL, the subsidy for a family of four will reach nearly $11,000 in 2014. But CBO estimates that only 3 million Americans will move from job-based insurance into the exchanges to take advantage of the subsidies, even though there are about 130 million Americans under age 65 with incomes between 100 and 400 percent FPL. Douglas Holtz-Eakin and Cameron Smith of the American Action Forum have estimated that as many as 35 million people will be moved out of job-based coverage and into subsidization. If that is the case, the 10-year cost of the coverage expansion provisions would jump by $400 billion more.
ON THE AVENUES: “The Drinker” (A Book Review).
5 hours ago
Obamacare was patterned after the universal plan in Massachusetts. All is not well in Massachusetts. Check out this article: http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/23/skyrocketing-massachusetts-health-costs-could-foreshadow-high-price-of-obamacare/
ReplyDeleteThe costs are skyrocketing and the benefits and quality of health care are plummeting. So why do the arrogant, know it all, liberals who passed Obamacare think that it will work well nationally?
Slim,
ReplyDeleteMay I ask how you would fix this healthcare issue we have going on here? I am sincerely interested in hearing your ideas. The clinics are now running at absolute full capacity, with more and more people enrolling everyday. In all my years working there, I have never seen demand so high for assistance with healthcare locally. Many of these people were making very good salaries and benefits a year ago, now they are without benefits and are chronically ill, and on the verge of loosing everything. Our employees felt the crunch here too, "private" insurance dropped our entire workpool because one employee had the nerve to get breast cancer, and another employee was selfish enough to have her kidneys fail. Now we have over 50 employees and their families with out healthcare coverage, and thus far have not been able to find a company that will underwrite us. So I would LOVE to here some ideas, not just criticism. ( I am not trying to be argumentative or sarcastic)
Christopher D